A computer's face match is a lead to investigate. In Robert Williams's case, an incorrect match helped bring police to an innocent man's home. A settlement announced on June 28, 2024 sought to stop that mistake from turning into an arrest again.
The crucial safeguard concerned the next step: police could not use the match alone to put someone into a photo lineup. They needed independent, reliable evidence connecting that person to the crime, according to the University of Michigan Law School's account of the agreement.
A mistaken match reached a family's front door
In 2020, police arrested Williams at his home in front of his wife and two children over a watch theft he had not committed. Michigan Law, whose lawyers represented him alongside the ACLU and the ACLU of Michigan, said the case was one of three known Detroit wrongful arrests involving facial recognition. All three people were Black.
Another identification is not necessarily independent evidence
A photo lineup asks a witness to choose among pictures. If the police put someone into that lineup only because software suggested him, a later selection can give the original mistake an appearance of confirmation.
The settlement addressed that chain. Along with the independent-evidence requirement before a lineup, it prohibited arrests based solely on a facial-recognition result or on a lineup directly following such a search, the university reported.
The agreement also called for officer training, an audit of cases since 2017 in which facial recognition was used to obtain an arrest warrant, and four years of court enforcement. Those were obligations described in 2024; the announcement does not establish what the subsequent audit found or how officers have complied.
This is an account of that settlement, not a new agreement in 2026 or a finding of liability. The linked announcement comes from Williams's legal representatives. The safeguard's practical test is whether investigators obtain evidence that does not merely repeat the computer's suggestion.