Skip to main content
Safety & Alignment

A fatal Tesla crash exposed gaps in both driver supervision and road protection

The NTSB found that Autopilot steered into a highway divider area, that the driver did not respond and that the damaged crash cushion did not work.

8 Nov 2026

In March 2018, a Tesla Model X traveling on US 101 in Mountain View steered into the paved area between highway lanes and an exit ramp. The National Transportation Safety Board found that limitations in Tesla's Autopilot and the driver's lack of response contributed to the fatal crash. It also found that the system did a poor job of monitoring whether the driver was engaged.

A view from southbound US-101 shows the split toward State Route 85. Two red arrows mark the brighter left edge of the painted divider area.
The NTSB drove through the site four days after the March 2018 crash. Its report notes that the left edge of the divider area was more visible than the right edge. · National Transportation Safety Board, report HAR-20/01, figure 13. U.S. public domain.

Image source · Reuse terms

Autopilot was providing partial driving automation. It handled steering and speed while the driver remained responsible for supervision. The investigation also identified a separate road failure. The crash cushion at the end of the barrier had been damaged and was no longer working, which the board found contributed to the severity of the driver's injuries.

The case shows how the safety of a partially automated car can depend on protections owned by different people and organizations. The vehicle's assistance, the driver's attention and the condition of the roadway all mattered.

Read the source.